Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1994-05-04 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1994-05-04 House Journal Page 4003 SB 308 Representative James brought up reconsideration of the vote on CSSB 308(FIN) am H (page 3972). The following was again before the House in third reading: 1994-05-04 House Journal Page 4004 SB 308 CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 308(FIN) am H "An Act modifying administrative procedures and decisions by state agencies that relate to uses and dispositions of state land, property, and resources, and to the interests within them; and modifying administrative procedures and decisions by state agencies that relate to uses and activities involving land, property, and resources, and to the interests within them, that are subject to the coastal management program when the use or activity is to be authorized or developed in phases; and providing for an effective date." Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that CSSB 308(FIN) am H be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of rescinding previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1 (page 3919). Objection was heard. Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that CSSB 308(FIN) am H with the pending motion be held until May 5, 1994. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall CSSB 308(FIN) am H be held with the pending motion until May 5, 1994?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 308(FIN) am H--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Return to Second Reading to rescind previous action on Amendment No. 1 Hold until May 5, 1994 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Mackie, Menard, Navarre, Nordlund, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis 1994-05-04 House Journal Page 4005 SB 308 Nays: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, MacLean, Martin, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Absent: Moses, Nicholia, Therriault And so, the motion failed. Representative Phillips placed a call of the House and lifted the call. Representative Brown placed a call of the House and lifted the call. The question being: "Shall CSSB 308(FIN) am H be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of rescinding previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 308(FIN) am H--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Return to Second Reading to rescind previous action on Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 26 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Barnes, Brice, Bunde, B.Davis, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Menard, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Nays: Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Martin, Navarre, Nordlund, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis 1994-05-04 House Journal Page 4006 SB 308 Absent: Nicholia Willis changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Barnes changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Foster changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Mackie changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Bunde changed from "Nay" to "Yea". And so, the motion passed and CSSB 308(FIN) am H was returned to second reading. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the House rescind previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1. Representative Navarre objected. Representative Phillips rose to a point of order stating that debate was straying from the question before the House. The Speaker stated that the point was well taken and cautioned the member to proceed in order. The question being: "Shall the House rescind previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 308(FIN) am H--RECONSIDERATION Second Reading Rescind previous action on Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 21 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Nays: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Menard, Navarre, Nordlund, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis 1994-05-04 House Journal Page 4007 SB 308 Absent: Nicholia And so, the motion passed and Amendment No. 1 was before the House. Amendment to Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Davies: Delete "60" Insert "45" Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that the amendment to Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall the amendment to Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 308(FIN) am H--RECONSIDERATION Second Reading Amendment to Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Foster, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Menard, Navarre, Nordlund, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis Nays: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Absent: Nicholia And so, the amendment to Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1994-05-04 House Journal Page 4008 SB 308 CSSB 308(FIN) am H--RECONSIDERATION Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brown, Bunde, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Foster, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Menard, Navarre, Nordlund, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis Nays: Barnes, Brice, G.Davis, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Absent: Nicholia Willis changed from "Nay" to "Yea". And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that CSSB 308(FIN) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 17. Representative Phillips objected. The question being: "Shall the House return to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 17?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 308(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Return to Second Reading for Amendment No. 17 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Hoffman, Mackie, MacLean, Menard, Navarre, Nordlund, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis 1994-05-04 House Journal Page 4009 SB 308 Nays: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Absent: Nicholia And so, the motion failed. Representative Phillips rose to a point of order regarding inappropriate debate. The Speaker cautioned the member to proceed in order.